In my cynical way, I tend to doubt that reworking all the style and positioning elements on these pages has improved the way they display for my mac friends. But I can hope. Besides, when I find out (inevitably) that my blog looks worse now than it did before, I will at least still have an intractable problem which might help to divert my attention away from the Summer-warmed bare-skin boys who inspire in me unattainable hopes and ignite conflagrations of desire.
I needn’t fear, even if I did fix these pages, for I will always be able to find some tedious and un-breathtaking preoccupation to keep me safe from Summer affairs and the trauma of dreams come true.
Please tell me if it still looks wrong. I need something to do…
It looks ok on a Mac. Speaking from a non-technical standpoint, the sidebar links to the archives look a bit screwy. And speaking from an aesthetic standpoint, I prefer sans-serif font. I liked what you had on your blogger blog (was it Verdana?) Anyway, minor point – what appeals to me is content, but I understand the appeal of massive redesign projects as distractions from the futility of love.
Whoah, I just looked at it in Netscape. It’s a mess, Joe. I don’t even know where to begin…
Revelations at:
http://www.dgsblog.net/pics/joe2.jpg
http://www.dgsblog.net/pics/joe3.jpg
I’m getting javascript errors too.
and the comments won’t post unless I put a fake e-mail address in. Unless that is your devious masterplan….
If it’s too much trouble, don’t worry, I’ll just go out and buy a PC.
The colours are so cool.
Last night I lost a long, deliciously poetic comment from this stupid little window, (actually, it was a stupid script thingy installed by me that did what it was supposed to and wiped out over an hour of composition). Now, I am in the wild and wooly world of w3c validators (or invalidators, as the case may be…) Thanks for your precious input, and please don’t give up on me yet.