joe.

Saturday, April 13, 2002.


eve of destruction?

I am Shirley-McLain-ian, to a degree.  I believe that I chose this life before I was born, and this spot on the planet to live it, and the people who were my family.  All these things I whine about, ...they've been happening forever, and probably will happen forever, and will happen whether I am here to gasp at the horror or not.

When one experiences an overwhelming trauma, I think a person tends to believe something like, "This horribleness is only happening here—it can't be like this everywhere."  Of course it is not horrible everywhere, but once a victim focuses solely on their own trauma, it is only a short step to seeing it as the only trauma. 

The eastern world it is explodin',
violence flarin', bullets loadin'.
You're old enough to kill, but not for votin'.
You don't believe in war, but what's that gun your totin'.
And even the Jordan River has bodies floatin'.

From the way I have lived my life you'd think that pain and suffering were my invention, that my surveillance of it is novel and unique, and that no one has ever noticed injustice before me.  I have to keep reminding myself: It is not all about me.  It never has been.


 

Friday, April 12, 2002.


scream silently

So what is the other response?  Tell me please.  Parts of the world containing millions of people are going to hell in a handbasket, and I skip merrily along like a girl in a Spring dress distributing depressing little vignettes as though they were flower petals.  But what's the other response? ...the one that does not dwell so tenaciously on tragedy?

(Let's see if i can do this without 'dwelling tenaciously on the tragedy.') 

Focusing away from the point-at, gasping, horror may not be the same thing as denying it is there, but it feels that way to me.  Pretending everything is OK is charged for me, supercharged emotionally.  As you may know, when I was two years old, I experienced a horror that has not yet ended.  But that event in itself is not the point.  The thing that makes it difficult for me not to scream (figuratively), even when screaming has been done to an annoying excess (like I have done in this blog), is that the two year old's screams were deliberately ignored.  The choice was made to ignore what happened, to pretend everything was OK, because in 1961 nobody wanted to put my father's brother in a mental institution, which would have been the course at the time, and nobody knew how to handle the rape of a child; nobody even wanted to admit that it had happened. 

So it didn't.  My screams all drowned in the sea of denial around me.  And my reality rejected my experience.  My going-on-three-year-old life in Northboro, Massachusetts became stunningly and tragically unreal when parents, family, extended family, and even family friends, all rejected my experience as if my story were the problem, instead of the horror it was reporting.

So, the image of skipping merrily along like a girl in a Spring dress distributing depressing little vignettes as though they were flower petals, captures in some way the absurdity of my experiences—perhaps the absurdity of everyone's experiences. 

And screaming, ...well, I don't know when to stop because I have been taught to believe that I make no sound at all. 




state conducted terrorism

[T]he accounts of the massive destruction of civilian homes, and of the firing on civilians [in the refugee camp of Jenin], could be confirmed as they also occurred in the town of Jenin, suggesting a widespread and systematic pattern of human rights abuses that is only now beginning to emerge.

I don't know where to start, this article tells of so many crimes and inhumanities.  Like rocketing and bulldozing homes while civilians still occupy them.  Like using prisoners as human shields.  Like extrajudicial executions and disposal of bodies in unmarked mass graves. 

Are the Israeli's allowed to do this because of the Holocaust?  We need to get over our gentile guilt.  I have only skimmed the surface of that genocide's horror, like lightly touching the numbers etched in glass, and even that was overwhelming.  But nothing justifies repeating that behavior.  Nothing.  I acknowledge the base urge of the Israeli people to return horrors and inhumanities for the horrors and inhumanities which have been inflicted on them.  But civilization, by definition, means that such atrocities are stopped, not perpetuated.  Sharon, in everything he has done his whole career, has sought to perpetuate the insanity of hatred.  Israel, stop him.

Where are the tears?  Where have our hearts and souls gone? 


 

Wednesday, April 10, 2002.


It is still. The camp waits, as if holding its breath. And then, out of the dry furnace air, a disembodied voice crackles over a loudspeaker.

"Come on, dogs," the voice booms in Arabic. "Where are all the dogs of Khan Younis? Come! Come!"

I stand up. I walk outside the hut. The invective continues to spew: "Son of a bitch!" "Son of a whore!" "Your mother's cunt!"

The boys dart in small packs up the sloping dunes to the electric fence that separates the camp from the Jewish settlement. They lob rocks toward two armored jeeps parked on top of the dune and mounted with loudspeakers. Three ambulances line the road below the dunes in anticipation of what is to come.

A percussion grenade explodes. The boys, most no more than ten or eleven years old, scatter, running clumsily across the heavy sand. They descend out of sight behind a sandbank in front of me. There are no sounds of gunfire. The soldiers shoot with silencers. The bullets from the M-16 rifles tumble end over end through the children's slight bodies. Later, in the hospital, I will see the destruction: the stomachs ripped out, the gaping holes in limbs and torsos.

Yesterday at this spot the Israelis shot eight young men, six of whom were under the age of eighteen. One was twelve. This afternoon they kill an eleven-year-old boy, Ali Murad, and seriously wound four more, three of whom are under eighteen. Children have been shot in other conflicts I have covered—death squads gunned them down in El Salvador and Guatemala, mothers with infants were lined up and massacred in Algeria, and Serb snipers put children in their sights and watched them crumple onto the pavement in Sarajevo—but I have never before watched soldiers entice children like mice into a trap and murder them for sport.

A Gaza Diary
by Chris Hedges

From the October 2001 issue of Harper's Magazine.




Harper's Magazine: A Gaza Diary




It is regrettable, but all too likely to be true, that the parents of suicide bombers are evil, their brothers are evil, their sisters are evil, their spouses are evil, and their children are born innocent but rendered evil by about the age of eight.

Rendered evil?  Is that like rendered fat?  No, of course not, but it makes about as much sense. 

It has taken me some time to come to terms with my anger and disappointment with Isreal, but I am now an unapologetic critic of Isreali actions.  Israel is the one in this conflict that has rockets, jets, helicopters, bulldozers, tanks and an army.  Isreal is using her military assests to silence, terrorize and punish the Palestinian people not for suicide bombings but for dissenting—dissent which by any account is overwhelmingly justified.  If anything, the suicide bombers have played into Sharon's bloody hands, and he has encouraged them every step of the way.  I have observed nothing but contempt from the Israeli government toward the Palestinians, whose land they occupy.  No rational assessment can conclude from current Israeli actions that the Palestinian people have any hope for the future beyond complete submission without protest, and increased suffering beneath the heel of a boot—until they are exterminated.  Israel wants ALL the land.

If there is an evil here, it certainly does not spring from the heart of a child who blows herself up in desperation and rage.  Nor does it originate in the heart of a 23 year old boy who has faced the black hole of an Israeli gunbarrel—more often than not pointed by a soldier in a livid rage—every work day for a year.  I submit to you that evil is a quality of behavior, not an entity in itself, and the side whose behavior has had the most evil effect is not the side least powerful and most villified.  Israel must change, or suffer the consequences of harboring evil, which will not come in the form af a crushing military assault like the one being waged against the Palestinians.  The consequences to Israel-the-oppressor will be a godless rot from within its own soul.  I think it has begun.




The officers said they were worried that the truth about the level of destruction wreaked in Jenin would do Israel's reputation abroad "great damage".

"However many wanted men we kill in the refugee camp... there is still no justification for causing such great destruction," said one of the anonymous officers.


 

Tuesday, April 09, 2002.


What the hell is real?  And will it hurt me?  The answers, respectively, are nothing, and yes. 

What does it matter what's real, anyway?  I mean, it's either nothing, or everything.  Or nothing and everything.  It is a superfluous question.  Doesn't matter.  And hurt?—that's a subjective thing.  If I'm addicted to pain killers and suddenly stop taking them, then just being awake hurts.  If I have attained a modest enlightenment around the issue of pain and suffering, then my injuries, though they hurt, serve to expand me rather than diminish me.  In the latter case, hurt is a desirable thing.  In fact, at some point beyond the fear and panic it might otherwise cause, hurt becomes a gratifying gift, the mark of an attenuated sensitivity to conscious life.

These are practical questions for me.  I have not gotten beyond the fear and panic yet to whatever it is that we call 'real'—the true story of me playing itself out in my absence.  I'm missing it.  Though I am in this story, I am not present to it.  I get glimpses of the story of me when people, usually strangers and usually in response to my writing, make observations about me.  This is like catching a distorted reflection of myself in the chrome of a passing car.  To say the least, this is a rather eclectic and remote way of appreciating the art of my own story.  But it proves I have not vanished.  Not yet. 

I am addicted to unconsciousness.  No drugs for me, thank you.  They are not strong enough.  They just leave me groggy, but still connected.  What I want is to completely disconnect; what do the shrinks call it?—dissociate.  That's what does it for me.  In the tacky personal exposes, and in the Readers' Digest versions of life, dissociation is described as being pushed out of your own body and floating ghostlike above it, beside it—somewhere nearby—and watching like a spectator while this horror or that is being perpetrated upon you.  I described it once rather aptly (if I do say so myself) in this snippet:

My life is an incomplete suicide, not because I have attempted it; I have not. But because my survival consists of half-living. I want to live, but the agony of all the living I could do and don't, all the emotional connections and relationships I shun, and the knowledge of people so totally alive as the guys I've mentioned, is getting to be too much pain.

...and that's just it, disconnecting hurts.  It's the only drawback.  Otherwise I could visit and observe life comfortably, like an oceanographer in a glass sphere, visiting a shipwreck.  Warm, dry, ...breathing.  As a tool for oceanography, this works.  As a tool for living life, it is an unweildy contraption requiring most of my effort just to cart it around.  It obstructs every touch and whisper, and it imposes upon anyone who would communicate with me the need make cryptic gestures in an impromptu sign language.  I am the boy in the bubble.  The only problem is that there is no goddamn reason for the bubble.  It's worthless.  It's useless.  And it is now causing more pain than it ever protected me from, once upon a time.  In panic now I cling to it, remembering how it saved me once.  But the quality of disconnecting, which was salvific decades ago, is rapidly becoming fatal today.

I can't wait to see what happens next.


 

Sunday, April 07, 2002.


And this from the book I am reading:

. . . sooner or later being less human leads the oppressed to struggle against those who made them so.  In order for this struggle to have meaning, the opressed must not, in seeking to regain their humanity (which is a way to create it), become in turn opressors of the oppressors, but rather restorers of the humanity of both.

This, then, is the great humanistic and historical task of the oppressed: to liberate themselves and their opressors as well.  The oppressors, who oppress, exploit and rape by virtue of their power, cannot find in this power the strength to liberate either the oppressed or themselves.  Only power that springs from the weakness of the oppressed will be sufficiently strong to free both.




It has been a sad and depressing ...week, ...month, ...season?  Life?  I don't know, but I hope this darkness lifts.  And I am glad this man is in the same world as me, at the same time as me—if for no other reason than to reinforce a feeble hope I have that people are all that really matter; that connections between souls are indeed possible; and that the dirty, cheap, puny things we do to each other both personally and globally have not, yet, submerged us completely.

There may be hope.




It is not peace that Sharon seeks with the Palestinians but their surrender and expulsion. Oppression and brute force are the only language he knows. The notions of bargaining, accommodation and compromise are alien to his whole way of thinking. For him Palestinian moderation poses a far greater threat than Palestinian extremism.